For a man with a satirical turn of mind, presidential election years can be trying. Apparently your humble, obedient servant here isn't angry enough to participate fully in the festivities.
Everywhere you turn, people are shaking their fists in each other's faces. On television and online that is. Most days, it'd be a good idea to don a crash helmet before opening Facebook. And the summer bickering season has hardly begun. These are mostly Republicans and Democrats fighting among themselves. The main event has yet to come.
Elsewhere, people go about their normal daily activities with seeming equanimity — although there's been a marked increase in convenience store parking space shootings, actually. But I digress.
Chez Pazienza recently described a mob of Bernie Sanders backers who disrupted a recent Hillary Clinton campaign event in Los Angeles. According to one witness, "[t]hey were cussing at people, calling women whores, and telling people to kill themselves. They were shouting in children's faces, blowing sirens in their ears, and making them cry."
Such antics would be hard to believe had Pazienza not posted video clips. Asked by Rachel Maddow to disavow such behavior, Sanders basically ducked the question. And this is the Hippie Party. On college campuses, Clinton supporters complain they're called "evil," poor things.
Do you suppose they require "trigger warnings"?
At such times I'm reminded of Jonathan Swift's timeless satire of the root causes of political fanaticism. Writing roughly 300 years ago in the wake of the English Civil War, Swift concocted an imaginary religious sect called "Aeolists." (Aeolus was the Roman god of wind.) His target was anybody who claimed to be "inspired," or as he saw it, filled with hot air.
"Words are but wind," Aeolists believed, "and learning is nothing but words; ergo, learning is nothing but wind." Swift depicted true believers "linked together in a circular chain, with every man a pair of bellows applied to his neighbour, by which they blew up each other to the shape and size of a [barrel] ... . When, by these and the like performances, they were grown sufficiently replete, they would immediately depart, and disembogue for the public good a plentiful share of their acquirements into their disciples' chaps."
Has a more apt description of candidate Donald Trump's cult of personality ever appeared? Is there nothing the man could say that would give his enraptured supporters pause? As Paul Waldman notes in the American Prospect, he's a one-man tidal wave of disinformation.
"First, there's the sheer breadth and character of his falsehoods. Absurd exaggerations, mischaracterizations of his own past, distortions about his opponents, descriptions of events that never occurred, inventions personal and political, foreign and domestic, Trump does it all ... . There has simply never been a candidate who has lied as frequently, as blatantly, and as blithely as Trump."
Trump outdid even himself on "Meet the Press" last Sunday, disemboguing a couple of thunderous falsehoods in our collective faces. First, he allowed as how he means to stop undocumented immigrants from voting in U.S. elections.
Informed by Chuck Todd that they're already prevented by law from doing so, Trump said, "You have places where people just walk in and vote."
If he could document even one such polling place, that would be newsworthy. But of course Trump cannot. Then he claimed the U.S. is "the highest-taxed nation in the world," he claimed. That one the interviewer unaccountably let go.
Actually, U.S. tax revenue ranks near the bottom of the developed world as a percentage of GDP — just above South Korea, Chile and Mexico. Corporate tax rates are theoretically high, but as most people know, loopholes are so plentiful that few companies pay the full bill.
U.S. tax revenue per capita ranks nearer the middle of industrialized nations. As conservatives never tire of pointing out in other contexts, most countries in the European Union pay twice as much as Americans.
But then, why bother? Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler recently devoted a column to debunking Trump's epic falsehoods. Some of them are downright funny.
No, Vladimir Putin never called Trump a "genius." He called him "flamboyant." Only Trump, of course, would seek the Russian strongman's approval.
But do such considerations matter to the man's encircled supporters, each with a bellows discreetly inserted?
I don't believe they do.