Please do not pass the local legislation as drafted about feeding in City parks.On this topic: State Rep. Bob Ballinger opined on Twitter today that he believed the city ordinance would run afoul of the state's relatively new religious freedom act — passed so that religion could be used as a pretext to discriminate against gay people. It also could be used to prevent city crackdowns on people practicing their religion by ministering to the needy, he said. I expressed my doubts about the expansiveness of this interpretation, but Ballinger pointed me to a Think Progress article about a successful lawsuit in Texas brought under a religious freedom statute to prevent a Dallas crackdown on church feeding efforts for the homeless. The parallels are not strictly identical, but the broader issues are the same. And you'll see from the article that Little Rock is only the latest in a long, mean tradition of city efforts to deprive the homeless and efforts to curb charitable religious intent has run afoul of more than one court. Cities are NOT prohibited from making rules, but they can make them so onerous that they amount to bans
You will appear - and be - heartless, lacking compassion, unChristian, inhumane, and mean.
You will stir up a firestorm of opposition that will embarras the City and cost millions $$$ MILLIONS in lost economic development
Those of us who feed the hungry [and homeless] will figure a way around the ordinance that you will like even less. ... I have some ideas.
Volunteer Coordinator. Feed the Hungry
The city of Little Rock seems to have taken more of a top-down approach
“cities can save a lot of time and money if they work with homeless service providers, work with homeless advocates, and adopt reasonable policies and procedures that constructively help get homeless people off the street as opposed to simply enacting these punitive ordinances on their own and then having to wind up in court,” said Jeremy Rosen, Advocacy Director for the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty (NLCHP).