Rutledge joins legal opposition to President Obama's clean air plan | Arkansas Blog

Rutledge joins legal opposition to President Obama's clean air plan

by

14 comments
Attorney General Leslie Rutledge announced this evening that she'd join with 15 other states in fighting President Obama's effort to limit emission of greenhouse gases from electric power plants. They want a stay of the EPA rule until completion of a pending legal challenge.

Obama's clean air plan is the "wrong direction," said Rutledge, though she didn't say what the right direction might be. Dig coal, burn it and turn up the air conditioner, I guess. Obama announced his plan Monday. I'm surprised it took two days for the Republican legal opposition to agree on the terms of the news release.

PS — Does it matter that a big majority of voters in swing states favor stronger clean air rules? Nope. Not to those beholden to the coal burners.

Her release:


Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge today released a statement after she joined 15 other States to ask the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for an immediate stay of its Clean Power Plan pending the outcome of an impending legal challenge to the rule.

“The EPA’s Clean Power Plan is the wrong direction,” said Attorney General Rutledge. “When it was announced earlier this week, I indicated that I was prepared to take any and all appropriate legal action to protect Arkansans from this unlawful plan, and that is exactly what I, and 15 other States, have done today. This stay is an important first step as legal action is planned.”

The stay request filed today with the EPA asks the agency to halt implementation of the plan until the courts have a chance to rule on its legality.

“Absent an immediate stay, the Section 111(d) Rule will coerce the States to expend enormous public resources and to put aside sovereign priorities to prepare State Plans of unprecedented scope and complexity,” the States write in the stay request. “In addition, the States’ citizens will be forced to pay higher energy bills as power plants shut down. In the end, the courts are likely to conclude that the Section 111(d) Rule is unlawful. At the very minimum, the States and their citizens should not be forced to suffer these serious harms until the courts have had an opportunity to review the Rule’s legality.”

The coalition has asked that the EPA take action on this stay request by Friday, Aug. 7.

Rutledge was joined in this request by the States of Alabama, Arizona, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming, and the Commonwealth of Kentucky.



From the ArkTimes store

Comments (14)

Showing 1-14 of 14

Add a comment
 

Add a comment

Clicky