hrc.jpg

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments today and tomorrow on two landmark civil rights cases — the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage and, Wednesday, a challenge to the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

You can do far worse for following developments than to check in with the scotusblog for background, preliminary events and summaries of arguments, plus analysis of what justices’ questioning might mean. The Human Rights Campaign, headed by Arkansas native Chad Griffin, is also a good page to visit.

Advertisement

I remain optimistic the cases will advance the cause of civil rights for gay people at least incrementally, even if the court doesn’t knock down legal discrimination in sweeping decisions. Those who favor continued legal discrimination against gay people, be of good cheer. There’s always Arkansas, where guns and fetuses are held sacred and where government intrusion is loathed except when necessary to enforce personal religious beliefs.

The Arkansas House will vote Wednesday on a resolution reaffirming the legislature’s support for prohibition of same-sex marriage and state discrimination against same-sex couples who move here (why?) legally married from more advanced states. I did receive a note this morning from the daughter of an Arkansas legislator who plans to speak against the resolution tomorrow. No, of course she’s not a Republican.

Advertisement

Good commentary here from a Georgetown law professor who, though favoring broad rights for gay people, thinks a sweeping decision might not be well-timed.

UPDATE: Early take is that the justices demonstrated no hunger to issue a sweeping ruling on a right to marriage in the California case. A decision that upholds the lower court rulings striking down the anti-gay-marriage initiative will be a big victory just the same and mean that more than 1 in 4 Americans live in a state where same-sex marriage is legal.

Advertisement

UPDATE II: Here’s a transcript of today’s U.S. Supreme Court arguments.

UPDATE III: It’s all about Kennedy as swing vote.

Advertisement

Arkansas Times: Your voice in the fight

Are you tired of watered-down news and biased reporting? The Arkansas Times has been fighting for truth and justice for 50 years. As an alternative newspaper in Little Rock, we are tough, determined, and unafraid to take on powerful forces. With over 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts, we are making a difference. But we can't do it without you. Join the 3,400 paid subscribers who support our great journalism and help us hire more writers. Sign up for a subscription today or make a donation of as little as $1 and help keep the Arkansas Times feisty for years to come.

Previous article Questions about the UAMS-St. Vincent merger Next article Hmmmm. Tone change on analysis of tort reform