Odds and ends on the political scene | Arkansas Blog

Odds and ends on the political scene



Random notes from the morning mail:

* INTERNATIONAL GATHERING IN LITTLE ROCK: A big deal set in Little Rock next week, though it's not open to the public. The Club de Madrid annual conference will be held at the Clinton Presidential Center Monday and Tuesday. More than 40 former heads of state and government leaders from around the world will attend for sessions on "Harnessing 21st Century Solutions: A Focus on Women." They'll talk aboout ways to empower women politically and economicallly. They've come to a place in need of some help ini that regard. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would be a perfect speaker at this event, of course, but recent events seem to make that unlikely. Maybe her hubby could fill in? The link to the Club de Madrid site lists a number of former national leaders who'll be here for the session. (PS — Security is out in force around the Capital Hotel this morning, measures that include blockage of Louisiana Street on the west side of the building. I presume this is related to the bigshots in town.)

RAPERT: Anyone worse?
  • RAPERT: Anyone worse?
* TAKING NOMINATIONS: Is there any more repugnant legislator than Sen. Jason Rapert? I'm taking nominations. His Twitter feed is a daily reminder of the revivalist's mean spirit, the latest his approving note that Domino Pizza baron Tom Monaghan has sued to challenge the federal law that requires a full range of preventive health care coverage for women in group health insurance policies. Pizza man doesn't want to cover contraception in insurance for his employees. Monaghan says contraception is not health care but a "gravely immoral" practice. Rapert, I guess, will contiine to do all he can to keep contraception out of the hands of Arkansas women. Barefoot and pregnant is, in fact, a historical tradition for senators from his neck of the woods. It would be nice if Rapert could suffer some of the same backlash that another Perry County lawmaker once suffered for a similar outlook.

* WHY DOES DUSTIN MCDANIEL HATE STRONGER ETHICS LAW? Paul Spencer, the Catholic High teacher laboring heroically to qualify the Regnat Populus ethics initiative for the Arkansas ballot, engages in some understandable snark about the picayunish attention Attorney General Dustin McDaniel is giving to defeat efforts to get the measure qualified for the ballot. Spencer's letter on the matter follows.

My Dear Friends,

The games continue. In spite of a very demanding fund-raising schedule, the Attorney General has found time to again reject our ballot title.

This rejection was based on the following two reasons;

1. Because we increased the penalty from a Class B Misdemeanor to the more serious Class A Misdemeanor, we failed to address the “mental state” of the offender-that is whether the person accused of a violation intended to accept the steak dinner at Doe’s, which was paid for by a person he/she knew to be a lobbyist, as compared to an accused person unwittingly accepting a steak dinner at Doe’s ,and paid for by some random citizen he/she did not know to be a lobbyist. Understandable, as this is a common occurrence in my career as a high school teacher. Furthermore, I might find this to be a credible reason if it were not for the fact that this particular point of law seems to be somewhat hit and miss in the States’ own hand books governing election rules and ethics material.

2. The second issue stems from what seems to be Regnat Populus’ ubiquitous chronic use of “ambiguous” punctuation. I have compared those portions of our 2014 measure that are intended to be identical to the 2012 language- specifically that of his oft-cited Opinion 2012-049- which was approved by Mr. Mc Daniel. Lo! There are indeed differences in the punctuation- the use of semi-colons where we had previously had used commas and hyphens! O- the humanity! Or is it “O, the humanity!”…. Who can know?

Now, I am told by the English faculty at work that the comma is the correct choice. However, our use of semi-colons does not change the meaning of the text. I’m not sure, but I don’t believe the A.G. has grammatical prerogative and thusly has not been invested by some mystical sacrament as the state Grammarian. Additionally, Mr. McDaniel-should he choose- may substitute a more accurate ballot title. As such, the “Campaign Finance and Lobbying Act of 2014” could have been changed to something more accurate. Perhaps the “Campaign Finance and Lobbying Act Formerly Using Commas But As Of Now Incorrectly using Semi-colons To Denote The End of Phrases Act Of 2014”.

So, what’s next? Clearly we’ll have to roll up our sleeves and change those semi-colons back into commas. We’ll add the one-yes, one word needed to rectify the” mental state” faux pas. Then re-submit. Then wait. Perhaps while we wait, we may feel compelled to ponder the inverse correlation that adding the state’s constitutional officers to our proposal has had on the likelihood of a speedy approval process. The good news resulting from all of this grammatical brinksmanship is that Mr. McDaniel is helping us craft so iron-clad a proposal that should he become governor, he himself would need to expend great effort as to not run afoul of his own handiwork.

My best wishes and prayers to you and to all you hold within your hearts during this holiday season.


Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

Add a comment