It's time | Arkansas Blog

It's time

by

84 comments

Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson says it's time for Obama to take a stand on gay marriage.  Equality is equality, he says.  Whether you like it or not.

Favoring "civil unions" that accord all the rights and benefits of marriage -- but that withhold the word marriage, and with it, I guess, society's approval -- amounts to another dodge. I'm concerned here with the way the law sees the relationship, not the way any particular church or religious leader sees it; that's for worshipers, clergy and the Almighty to work out. Marriage is not just a sacrament but also a contract, and the contractual aspect is a matter of statute, not scripture.

Obama took the "civil unions" route during last year's campaign and has stuck with it. While I see the political calculation -- that was basically the position of all the major Democratic candidates -- I never understood the logic. If semantics are the only difference between a civil union and a marriage, why go to the trouble of drawing a distinction? If there are genuine differences that the law should recognize, what are they?

From the ArkTimes store

Comments (84)

Showing 1-25 of 84

Add a comment
 

Add a comment

Clicky