The state Supreme Court dealt the payday lending industry another defeat today, though it’s still on a narrow bonding issue. The mother of all slapdowns on this gang of usurers is still someday in the future.

Attorney General Dustin McDaniel, whose constitutional duty it is to defend the state board that oversees the laughably unconstitutional scheme a payday-lenders-oiled legislature approved, offers this comment on the decision today:

Advertisement

This case, and the McGhee case handed down on the 17th, potentially sound the death knell for this industry.  Jim DePriest and I met today and are considering our immediate options.  I told the D-G today that we see this as devastating to the licensed payday lenders.  We also think that bonding companies will flee the market.  The Board decided two years ago that the conduct of the defendants in these cases did not invoke the bond protections.  This office was required to represent the Board in the appeal, but essentially abdicated our time last Thursday to the bond company’s lawyer.  As the Board’s lawyers, we will always defend their actions.  As a consumer advocate, I see these decisions as giving us new wind in our sails. 

Invest in the future of great journalism in Arkansas

Join the ranks of the 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts who know that the Arkansas Times is the go-to source for tough, determined, and feisty journalism that holds the powerful accountable. For 50 years, our progressive, alternative newspaper in Little Rock has been on the front lines of the fight for truth, and with your support, we can do even more. By subscribing or donating to the Arkansas Times, you'll not only have access to all of our articles, but you'll also be helping us hire more writers and expand our coverage. Don't miss out on the opportunity to make a difference with your subscription or donation to the Arkansas Times today.

Previous article ‘Arkansas Twist’ writer dies at 74 Next article Obama v. Clinton