The Eureka Springs City Council last night suspended the rules and hurriedly passed a civil rights ordinance that extends anti-discrimination protection to gay people in employment, housing and public accommodations.

Famously tolerant Eureka has a history of official actions supportive of gay people, including the domestic partnership registry, a symbolic hand of friendship to the many gay people who make Eureka s popular tourist destination.

Advertisement

Before long, you can watch the action on Eureka’s YouTube channel, where all council meetings are recorded.

Eureka passed the ordinance hours after the state Senate approved Sen. Bart Hester’s bill to ban local governments from passing such ordinances. The law was a response to a similar ordinance passed in Fayetteville and later repealed by voters.

Advertisement

I wrote yesterday that state enforcement of such a law (which could be passed in the House this week) presents a legal question in light of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that it was unconstitutional for Colorado to ban laws to protect gay people. Hester’s bill likely was written with that in mind, by not mentioning homosexuality specifically. It says  that cities and counties may not add civil rights protections not included in state law. It is legal under state law to discriminate against gay people. But the object of discrimination —- LGBT people — is clear in the sponsor’s long history of anti-gay sentiment, including a threat to withhold money from the University of Arkansas because its chancellor criticized the Fayetteville Chamber of Commerce’s opposition to the civil rights ordinance.

Sen. Keith Ingram also mentioned in debate yesterday another legal problem I’d noted with this law: It bars special preferences of any sort.

Advertisement

Little Rock, he noted, gives some special preferences in bidding to local companies. Many cities offer special prices to city attractions for families and the elderly. All present potential legal problems under the law.

The possibility of losing a lawsuit — particularly in the name of religion — has never deterred the Arkansas legislature before.

Advertisement

UPDATE: Blue Hog Report, written by lawyer Matt Campbell, expands on the legal problems with this bill.

Be a Part of the Fight

Step up and make a difference by subscribing or donating to the Arkansas Times, the progressive, alternative newspaper in Little Rock that's been fighting for truth for 50 years. Our tough, determined, and feisty journalism has earned us over 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts, all of whom value our commitment to holding the powerful accountable. But we need your help to do even more. By subscribing or donating, you'll not only have access to all of our articles, but you'll also be supporting our efforts to hire more writers and expand our coverage. Join us in the fight for truth by subscribing or donating to the Arkansas Times today.

Previous article Another week’s opening open line: Also, doctor arrested on child sex charge Next article Legislature has many freebie options today